Crossfire Wargame Rules

  1. Crossfire Wargame Rules 2019
  2. Crossfire Miniatures Rules


Rules and Organisations for Company-Level WW-II Gaming
A Review by Barrie Lovell

NOTE: although these rules are ostensibly for WWII gaming, theyare included here since they are perfectly well suited to Vietnam gaming and canbe used as such by incorporating the excellent Incoming! rules supplementwritten by Barrie - Mike R

'War is the province of chance. In no other sphere of human activity must such a margin be left forthis intruder. It increases the uncertainty of every circumstance and deranges the course of events.... 'Karl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) Prussian military leader, author

Having designed and written my own wargames rules for more years than I care toremember (including Free Fire Zone), and havingpublished several sets commercially with some success, I thought I was pretty au fait with game design.Although I often run across good game mechanisms or ideas, most wargames rule sets tend to be veryconventional, following carefully laid out sequences. These are, of course, an attempt to bring a gameablesense of order to what is essentially a chaotic activity – war. The main problem with most rules sets is thatthey are predictable and can be exploited by the 'rules lawyers'. In extreme cases, a good 'rule lawyer' canbeat an opponent who has a greater understanding of the historical period in question. Personally I feel thatthis is a major flaw in game design, but one which is destined to remain with us until there is a major shift inthe way wargamers think about what they are trying to game.

Wargame Rules for Great Britain's 19th Century Colonial Wars Victoria's Battles is a highly playable set of rules for playing battles set in the period of Great Britain's 19th Century colonial wars. Book Two: the Zulu War is the second in a series of rules covering the British colonial military experience. Musing on Crossfire as a board game Crossfire is not a board game. But it could be. This is a bit of a thought experiment on what Crossfire might look like as a board game. It all came about one Saturday morning when I was having a WhatsApp conversation with my wargaming crew on “Crossfire as a board game”.

  • The rules were written by Arty Conliffe, with help from Rob Wolsky, and are published by Quantum Printing of 460 West 34th Street, New York NY 10001. Like all good sets of rules, Crossfire sets out to capture the particular feel of the type of warfare it simulates.
  • Multi-player games have a number of advantages over 1-on-1 games: They’re big and allow lots of toys on the table; they can more accurately simulate a command hierarchy; they can be more sociable. Crossfire is, however, really designed as a 1-on-1 game. This page lists several suggestions for how to turn Crossfire into a multi-player game.
Rules

It is not all doom and gloom however. Occasionally I find a game design which is so good it makes me think'I wish I'd thought of that!', unfortunately though, these rule sets are usually few and far between. However,Crossfire, by the talented Arty Conliffe, stands head and shoulders above the rest in both originality anddesign. In his introduction Arty Conliffe states that a friend once challenged him to design a historicalminiatures game which did not use either rulers, tape measures or a fixed game turn. Crossfire is the result.

'Everything is very simple in war, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate andproduce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen war....'Karl von Clausewitz (1780-1831) Prussian military leader, author

The most revolutionary aspects of the Crossfire system are that it does not use fixed time or ground scales,and that there is no game turn sequence. The player is therefore forced to rely on experience, knowledge oftactics, and his ability to read a battle and react to circumstances – in effect to behave more like a realcommander than is usual in a wargame.

The system is simplicity itself. One player (usually the attacking player) starts with the initiative. He retainsthe initiative and may continue to move, fire, rally troops etc as long as he is not prevented from doing so byenemy activity or bad luck (Clausewitz's friction!). During the player's initiative the enemy player will beattempting to wrest the initiative from him by interfering with his activity (usually by firing). Once the playerwith the initiative loses it (as a result of enemy activity or bad luck) then the initiative passes to his opponentand the roles are reversed.

Crossfire is all about seizing and retaining the initiative – it is technically possible, although extremelyunlikely, that a player may start the game with the initiative and retain it until he wins. The player must workhard at keeping the initiative. To paraphrase good old Clausewitz 'Everything in Crossfire is simple, butretaining the initiative is difficult'. The player with the initiative may carry out a limited number of activities –move, direct fire, indirect fire, retreat move, rally – and as long as these are successful he keeps theinitiative. The player is therefore required to concentrate only on those activities that will either keep theinitiative or actively help towards victory. Time wasting activity is either not allowed or is penalized by losingthe initiative. The effect of Clausewitzian 'friction' is simulated by dice throws – a bad dice score causes anactivity to fail and the player loses the initiative. A very simple concept but very effective.

Crossfire Wargame Rules 2019

While the player with the initiative is carrying out his activities the enemy player is attempting to seize theinitiative. This is usually done by reactive firing at observed activities. A successful reactive fire will suppressor destroy the target and will trigger a change of initiative. For the defender this means that he must deployhis troops with very careful planning to ensure that he can dominate the battlefield with fire in order toprevent enemy movement. The title of the rules is a clue – Crossfire. The best way to stop an enemy is toensure that the defensive fire plan consists of interlocking fields of fire. Thus any enemy movement can bebrought under fire and stopped in its tracks.

There is no fixed order in which the player with the initiative must carry out his activity – he makes thedecisions what to do and when, in effect co-ordinating his own actions rather than having them imposedupon him by a fixed sequence.

Movement - Movement is very simple. Every type of unit may move an unlimited distance, but only in astraight line and from one terrain item (or cover) to another. The unlimited movement rate is not a problem asunits tend to move in short bursts from cover to cover, as do most real soldiers on the modern battlefield.Players who do not make the best use of cover (including folds and dips in the ground) will suffer accordingly– troops in the open are very vulnerable to machine gun and supporting fire. Movement is also very fast. Themoving player nominates a unit to move and indicates the destination and the path it will take. He thenmoves the unit towards its destination. If the moving unit is observed at any point during its move by anunsuppressed enemy unit it may be fired upon, hence the need to make best use of cover. Of course,cunning players will allow a couple of enemy units through a killing zone – to lull the enemy into a falsesense of security and to wait for a better target!

Firing - As with movement firing is also simple. There are two types of fire – Direct and Indirect. All the actionon the table top is assumed to be within the range of all weapons involved. When one considers that we arerepresenting close infantry action where the enemy is a matter of yards away rather than hundreds of metresthen this concept actually works quite well (it is fudged a bit with some anti-tank weapons and support firebut it does not detract from the game).

Direct fire is aimed fire at targets that can be seen by the firing unit. Reactive direct fire is permitted to theplayer without the initiative in response to enemy activity that can be seen by the firing unit. Simple!

Indirect Fire includes any heavy or support weapon fire that cannot directly observe the target and includesoff-table weapons.

Each type of firing unit has a set number of D6 firing dice (eg rifle squadhas 3 dice, HMG has 4 dice). Each timea unit fires it throws the relevant number of dice. Any which score 5 or 6 count as hits. One hit pins the target,two hits suppresses it and three hits destroys it. The number of dice thrown is reduced by one if the target isin cover. The system is fast, fire is either effective or it is not, and requires almost no reference to the rulebook – no lengthy charts or tables to wade through. Any firing which fails to at least suppress the target losesthe initiative.

'There is nothing more exhilarating than to be shot at withoutresult... 'Winston Churchill

Free wargame rules

The game effectively revolves around the old British Army concept of winning the firefight. Once you haveestablished fire superiority and the enemy has been pretty much pinned, suppressed or destroyed, you canthen start to move around without too much trouble. It is usually at this point that the decisive breakthrough ismade which will win the game.

Close Combat - Close combat is also simple but very deadly. The initiative player nominates an attackingunit and a target. He then moves up to attack it. The non-initiative player may try and hold the attackers offwith fire but if this does not succeed then it all comes down to close combat. This is short and sharp and theloser is destroyed – no ifs or buts! Good players will ensure that the target unit has been shot up andsuppressed before assaulting it.

Pictures from the authors collection of a recent Vietnam game - 'The Bridge at Phu Vau'

Terrain - Terrain plays a very important part in the game, providing shelter and protection for units. The gamedoes require a lot of terrain however, the more realistic the better. It is a set of rules that really does benefitfrom some of the excellent model terrain that is currently available. Each type of terrain also has an effect ofthe game with respect to how units can move or operate.

Unpredictable - Crossfire is unpredictable. Another famous Prussian General, von Moltke I think, once said'No plan ever survives contact with the enemy.' This is very true in Crossfire, although a sound plan will go aconsiderable way to minimizing the effect of enemy activity. The game is inherently chaotic, with the initiativeand activity switching back and forth and at different points around the table top with sometimes bewilderingspeed – it is up to the player to impose some sense of order on the game and to impose his will on theenemy. Unlike most rule sets Crossfire does not allow you to see a counter attack coming and redeploy tomeet it. In Crossfire usually the first you know about it is when your flanking unit collapses and enemy troopsappear behind you! Equally however, the enemy cannot react to your own counter attacks.

Crossfire is also inherently unfair – just like the real thing! Real war is unfair; soldiers will make the utmosteffort to get the drop on the opposition. In order to succeed in Crossfire you must do the same. This isusually achieved by concentrating either manpower or firepower at the critical point and overwhelming theopposition. Once you have the advantage you must keep the pressure up and do not allow the enemy torally.

Advantages of Crossfire

Crossfire has a lot of advantages for gamers, particularly those whose gaming time is limited.

Crossfire Miniatures Rules

  • Crossfire is very easy to learn (but difficult to master!)
  • Crossfire is very fast to play – there is no constant need to measure ranges or movement, or to refer to charts or books. Players can therefore spend time on their plans and tactics.
  • No tape measures – no arguments over how far units can move or fire
  • Multiple basing of figures allows for rapid movement. Most units comprise several model figures on a single base. It is possible to produce rather nice little dioramas that really improve the look of the game.
  • Visually Crossfire games are very attractive – lots of models and scenery and little in the way of clutter except for a few D6's. The terrain looks realistic and also plays a part in the game.
  • Crossfire is one of the FEW rule sets I have ever found where an understanding of tactics and history is more important than a knowledge of the rules.
  • Crossfire produces an obvious winner – no more arguing over who won or lost. Equally importantly, the point at which the game was decided is usually pretty obvious.
  • Crossfire is excellent for street fighting games. This is usually a week point in many other rule sets.

Disadvantages

  • Crossfire also has a few disadvantages, but in my opinion these are minor points that do not really detract from the overall game.
  • Weapon ranges are non-existent and all weapons have the same range. Since all of the fighting is deemed to be taking place well within the capabilities of the weapons concerned this does not cause any problems with play – if this is really a major problem for you then go play some other 'realistic' system.
  • Difficult to translate real terrain to Wargames maps. The lack of a ground scale makes it difficult to translate real ground to the tabletop. This is not really a problem however. A friend of mine has successfully run a Crossfire campaign using a series of maps in a WW2 regimental history as a basis for the tabletop terrain.
  • Crossfire is designed primarily for infantry action – armour rules are basic but do benefit from a couple of modifications. Tanks and AFVs can play an important role in the game but do not dominate it. Infantry anti-tank weapons all play an important role and even powerful vehicles such as Tigers and JSII's are at risk from the Piat or Panzerfaust. The list of vehicles is sufficiently detailed to allow a wide variety of vehicles.

In addition to the actual playing rules Crossfire includes orders of battle for German, British, Soviet, Italian,US, French and Japanese units, plus a comprehensive selection of AFV data. There is also a section ondesigning scenarios and a points system.

The 'Hit the Dirt' Crossfire supplement has a selection of WW2 scenarios and a bunch of new rules thatimprove (if possible) on the original game. These include rules for night combat, and a rather good systemfor randomly controlling the passage of time during a game. This allows the use of time limits and deadlines,and produces games that last for hours of game time rather than minutes (more realism!).

The Crossfire system has taken off quite well in the UK. My own club, Shrewsbury Wargames Society, nowuses Crossfire almost exclusively for WW2 games, and we have used the rules for a number ofdemonstration and participation games. The basic system is also branching out into other periods. Crossfirevariants for the Spanish Civil War and the Vietnam War are available on the internet. I have also written aVietnam supplement, called Incoming! which Mike Ruffle has kindly agreed to publish on this web site.

Well, that is Crossfire in a nutshell. Although radically different from any other rule set the concepts aresound and easy to understand. My own first few games with Crossfire were a shambles until I learned how tocombine movement and fire and to really study the lie of the land on the table top. I also found the absenceof a tape measure a bit disconcerting, however the real revelation came when I realized how fast andrealistic the games were. It is probably the most entertaining and innovative set of rules I have seen and,speaking as a soldier with 23 years service, it most realistically reproduces the problems encountered inaction. It is certainly the closest I have come to representing Clausewitz's ideas of 'friction' on a wargamestable. Like all good ideas Crossfire is essentially simple, however it produces a game which is far morechallenging than most.

If you like games with '30 second' turns, or lots of charts and data, or if you feel the differences between thePanther ausf A and D, or the type of magazine fitted to a PPsh sub machine gun, is important to the level ofgame realism, or if you like games where the game turn is so predictable you can exploit loopholes thenCrossfire is not for you. However, if you want to play games which are fast, unpredictable and exciting andalso which reflect real history as described by the men who were there, then give Crossfire a try.

Barrie Lovell

Author of Free Fire Zone